Examples
Examples
Try the starting example
- Non-negative peer ratings
- 1,2,3
- Group score (%)
- 60
- Individual score cap (%)
- 100
- Normalised individual scores (%)
- 30, 60, 90
- Score budget after caps
- 180
- Unallocated score budget
- 0
- Multipliers relative to group score
- 0.5, 1, 1.5
Try another scenario
- Non-negative peer ratings
- 1,2,3
- Group score (%)
- 80
- Individual score cap (%)
- 100
- Normalised individual scores (%)
- 40, 80, 100
- Score budget after caps
- 220
- Unallocated score budget
- 20
- Multipliers relative to group score
- 0.5, 1, 1.5
Calculation method
Calculation method
Normalised individual scores (%)
Group score × rating / mean rating, capped independently at the entered cap. No redistribution after capping.
Score budget after caps
Sum capped scores.
Unallocated score budget
Group score × participant count − sum capped scores.
Multipliers relative to group score
Rating / mean rating, before capping.
Symbols and units
- a
- Non-negative peer ratings
- b
- Group score (%)
- c
- Individual score cap (%)
Use the units shown. A list keeps the order in which you enter its values. The symbol ^ means “raised to the power of”.
Assumptions & limits
Assumptions & limits
- Applies your chosen mean-normalisation rule to a group mark. Caps can leave an undistributed budget; this is displayed explicitly, with no hidden redistribution. It does not validate peer fairness.
Are these inputs private?
These calculations run in your browser. A shared link contains the values you choose to share. Only questions submitted to the separate AI finder are sent to OpenAI.
Further reading
OpenStax: arithmetic and geometry ↗
Background reading; this does not imply endorsement or independent review of SumFizz.